According to the dictionary, objectivity is
judgement based on observable phenomena and uninfluenced by emotions or
personal prejudices. The true definition however is different for almost
every journalist. Every journalist should practice objectivity, but every
journalist has a different opinion on how to really express objectivity.
Journalists are obligated to present information that the public needs to
know. Their number one priority is to the citizens. For me,
objectivity is telling a news story with enough information to get the point of
the story across, but not allowing emotions to take control. Without
emotions playing a part in the story, it is easier to see both sides of the
story and not be biased.
"The new journalism tends to
be more personal. It prefers transparency to objectivity or self-effacing
neutrality. Across journalism programs, there is a trend toward teaching
a perspectival journalism that draws conclusions, and argues for
interpretations. This challenges the previous dominance of objectivity as
an ideal." -Stephan Ward
Like Ward said, objectivity is different for every journalist. For
some, transparency is enough. For me, objectivity should be shown by providing
a story with sufficient information to make the readers feel like they have
obtained knowledge or useful information. Objectivity includes refraining
from letting emotions take control in a story. Journalists should not be
cold hearted when covering a story, but they need to remember their first
priority is providing the public with the information they need to be
self-governing.